Attend a demonstration
Would you like to find out more about our CMMS solutions?
Book your demonstration today!
Would you like to find out more about our CMMS solutions?
Book your demonstration today!
In order for the project to be successful, the implementation of a CMMS (Computer-aided maintenance management) necessarily requires a detailed and thorough analysis of needs, a precise definition of objectives, careful preparation of the players and the support of all involved. Indeed, such an approach must be carried out under the impetus of the management and the participation of the company’s personnel. These prerequisites will make it possible, on the one hand, to make a relevant choice from among the offerings on the market and, on the other hand, to reflect on the most intelligent and effective organisations.
“…the main problem with the CMMS is not a technical problem but that it requires a cultural shift.”
The statistics compiled from students who do their internship in the field of maintenance or their apprenticeship in a company are very articulate. Around 20% of topics discussed are entitled “choice and implementation of a CMMS tool in our company”. After 6 months of consultations and sometimes difficult discussions between the different departments, we see that the main problem of the CMMS is not a technical problem but requires a shift in culture which must be accepted by all company departments and managers: purchasing, methods, manufacturing, maintenance, new works, accounting. The majority of the conclusions of these internship reports lead almost irremediably to an acknowledgment of failure when there is no person designated by name to take responsibility for a CMMS project, even if the specifications have been clearly defined and the CMMS package purchased and installed. In some cases the student’s departure signals the end of the use of the tool, even though it seemed to be well accepted and provided services that were deemed satisfactory…
The decision to invest in a CMMS tool involves the careful assessment of company department habits when, for historical reasons, they use different coding systems for the same piece of equipment according to their particular field (purchasing, methods, new projects, maintenance, or operations). The CMMS product offer and market are moving towards the use of nomadic technologies, which will require that the habits that were developed since the first installation be reassessed.
It is always difficult for a decision-maker to choose something that is both long-lasting and suitable for the company. Many companies that decided to invest in a particular product ten years ago are now changing their strategies to adopt software packages that will eventually become de facto standards—a situation that some people do not agree with, comparing it to conventional office software.
Find out more about the CMMS solution adapted to your business sector :
CARL Source Factory:
The CMMS dedicated to the Industry 4.0 sectorCARL Source Facility:
GTP and CMMS solution for real estateCARL Source City:
CMMS for local authorities
and administrationCARL Source Transport:
CMMS solution for the Transport sector
“…CMMS can be a decision support tool.”
A CMMS is part of the information, management and control system for the maintenance function, whose purpose is to maintain facilities and buildings in working order so that they are capable at all times of meeting their design specifications in an efficient and economical manner. The computerised management tool is thus an aid to tracking, archiving, analysing, and decision-making.
Generally, the CMMS can therefore be a decision-making tool that helps to:
As the publishers of CMMS software have shown, regular improvements are made in the ergonomics of display modules, their capabilities and power (faster processing speed, increasingly powerful databases compatible with different data standards), and in the wide variety of choices for data summary presentations for use by decision-makers (from a pie chart giving the annual costs of a given facility to the optional decision-making tool).
The computer processors that run CMMS applications are constantly improving; they have gone from processing speeds of a few tens of MHz to processors operating at over 3 GHz. Thanks to developments in computer architecture, systems are available in the form of a standalone workstation, an Intranet (or Extranet) network, or a client-server network. This means that there is a product to cover practically any type of requirement. The maintenance department looking for a system is therefore spoilt for choice, but will often need to consult the company’s information systems department and its information systems policy.
The first consideration to be borne in mind by those seeking to acquire a CMMS is that the tool will need to be used in an ergonomic fashion, just like a telephone or a screwdriver, without requiring any computer skills. It is of great value, however, to arrange for the information systems department to provide support for any powerful software, because knowledge of databases will be useful. The key to obtaining the right CMMS package is first to define the true user requirements and to buy only the features that are of use to the company.
Article to discover
« Why use a CMMS? »
A specification must be drawn up using value analysis and functional analysis techniques (for the functional specification). This defines the requirements in terms of useful features, not in terms of features already defined.
As L. D. Miles, the founder of value analysis after the Second World War remarked, “If I cannot obtain a product, I must obtain the features of the product.” This can be summed up by substituting the sentences written by M. Delafolie in his book on value analysis: “What CMMS features should I buy?” rather than “What CMMS software should I buy?”
This has become common practice in design or re-design studies for industrial products and services, and is perfectly suited to the situation of defining a CMMS specification.
Experience has shown that, if these precautions are not taken, many CMMS projects end up lying forgotten in the bottom drawer because they did not satisfy user requirements.
As Jean-Claude Francastel said at the 15th CMMS panorama, the most important pieces of advice are:
One of the most difficult tasks is to get rid of old habits. User scepticism is a very common obstacle; they often say, “We’ve been doing it our way for ten years and we don’t see any reason to change our methods now.”
The experience of companies that have chosen a CMMS system is characterised by two very different attitudes:
a) When companies (small ones) do not have any in-house expertise in the field, in most cases the decision-makers made a subjective choice according to the selling points and offers put forward by the CMMS sales representative. This entails major risks: the product can only partially fulfil the company’s needs. It might be expensive to operate and maintain. Production delays caused by software malfunctions can end up damaging the company’s image and lead to loss of market share.
b) When the company has in-house resources or uses subcontractors to draw up the functional specification, they are partially protected from poor choices not suiting their functional requirements. The advantage of this method, which costs a lot of time and money during the specification phase, is that it can garner many responses to an invitation to tender based on the customer’s functional specification. The final purchase decision is often made by an ad hoc committee, and the risk of subsequent problems is minimised thanks to the multidisciplinary evaluation performed.
The use of word processing software has become commonplace in every business sector in spite of some initial reluctance at the prospect of using a screen, a keyboard and a mouse. The introduction of a CMMS tool in companies will follow a similar path.
Employees must be prepared for this gradual change in mindset, short-term objectives must be set, and employees must be kept informed regularly about the increased productivity obtained thanks to the CMMS tool. It is essential that the people who feed data into the CMMS software are able to see the results and know that the efforts they have been asked to make are strategic for the company.
This is the price of ensuring the success of all the effort made by all categories of personnel. The best proof of a well set-up CMMS comes when the information system breaks down and it is no longer possible to access the operating features of the equipment of a manufacturing facility. All employees are then without their asset management tool, and operations can be paralysed for several hours.
A CMMS package satisfying all the requirements of a company should be just as essential as the telephone or the maintenance technician’s toolbox.
The contact AFIM has with the various maintenance associations that have undertaken surveys of users of CMMS tools allows us, thanks to their kind permission, to use key elements of their results. This study was carried out within the framework of the Junior Maintenance Clubs by Damien VUJICIC and David DIJON, students in a Master’s degree in Industrial Systems Engineering – Technical Management and Maintenance specialisation at the Institut universitaire professionnalisé de Sénart (University of Paris XII).
First observation: the level of user satisfaction and return on investment varies greatly. Most of those surveyed consider that major or minor benefits were obtained through the use of the CMMS. However, between 20% and 40% of those interviewed were unable to determine whether the installation of the CMMS had provided any improvements. 20% of the answers revealed that the CMMS system had been incorrectly sized.
The answers show that the success of a CMMS installation depends on the involvement of the management team, the correct choice of CMMS software, and effective training of personnel.
The answers indicated that those considering replacing or upgrading their CMMS give more importance to the right choice of CMMS software and do not consider software training to be a major factor of success.
(Please note that the sum of the answers does not reach 100% because some companies did not answer all the questions)
Benefits obtained with the CMMS | Very significant % |
Significant % |
None % |
No answer % |
---|---|---|---|---|
Reduced labour | 9.2% | 37.5% | 31% | 11.5% |
Reduced material costs | 11.5% | 43.7% | 20.7% | 13.8% |
Increased availability | 21.8% | 33.3% | 25.3% | 9.2% |
Increased reliability | 21.8% | 35.6% | 24.1% | 8% |
Improved cost control | 44.8% | 26.4% | 16.1% | 2.3% |
Improved feedback | 46.6% | 18.4% | 23% | 2.3% |
Improved maintenance scheduling | 32.2% | 36.8% | 18.4% | 2.3% |
Improved actual maintenance time | 37.9% | 32.2% | 16.1% | 2.3% |
Improved management of spare parts | 24.1% | 37.9% | 23% | 4.6% |
WHAT ARE THE TWO MOST IMPORTANT FACTORS THAT LED TO THE SUCCESSFUL IMPLEMENTATION OF YOUR CMMS?
Factor | % naming this factor as most important | % naming this factor as second most important | % naming this factor as first or second most important |
---|---|---|---|
Involvement of management | 20% | 26% | 46% |
Choosing the right CMMS software | 23% | 12% | 35% |
Effective training | 9% | 16% | 25% |
Return on investment | 14% | 10% | 24% |
Allocated budget | 5% | 14% | 19% |
Culture change supported by management | 11% | 8% | 19% |
Efficient management of the project group | 9% | 10% | 19% |
Technical support from software supplier | 9% | 4% | 13% |
WHAT WAS YOUR MAIN REASON FOR CHANGING OR ACQUIRING YOUR CMMS SOFTWARE?
Reason | Percentage |
---|---|
To increase maintenance performance | 25% |
To increase functionality | 18.4% |
To integrate maintenance with other company features | 10.3% |
Don’t know | 9.2% |
The supplier no longer provides after-sales service for the old CMMS package | 2.3% |
To comply with internal company standards | 2.2% |
You can get more information at the AFIM website
Main authors: Jean-Claude Francastel, Gilles Zwingelstein, Francis Vasse
© AFIM 2007